feat(aml,risk-review,accounting): update financial activity mapping options, AML flagged transactions filters, and risk review report

src/app/risk-review/risk-review-report.component.ts

@@ -264,7 +264,12 @@ export class RiskReviewReportComponent implements OnInit {
         )
       )
     ).subscribe((results) => {
-      const byClient = new Map(results.map((r) => [r.id, r]));
+      const byClient = new Map(
+        results.map((r) => [
+          r.id,
+          r
+        ])
+      );
       this.liveAlerts = rows.map((r) => {
         const info = byClient.get(r.clientId);
         return {
@@ -470,24 +475,24 @@ export class RiskReviewReportComponent implements OnInit {
         ]
       },
       {
-        // Its own section, and above "no change needed", because it is the opposite of that. An unrated customer
-        // whose money is moving has no rating for the behaviour to be compared against, so nothing here can say
-        // whether it is in keeping - the work is to rate them, and grouping them under "no change needed" buried the
-        // one action the report was asking for.
+        // Its own section, and above the watching list, because it is the opposite of that. An unrated customer whose
+        // money is moving has no rating for the behaviour to be compared against, so nothing here can say whether it
+        // is in keeping - the work is to give them one, and grouping them with the customers nothing need be done
+        // about buried the one action the report was asking for.
         key: 'unrated',
-        title: 'Rating needed',
+        title: 'Update risk',
         hint: 'These customers are transacting with no rating on file. Nothing can be judged against a rating that does not exist — rate them first.',
         tone: 'up',
         rows: rest.filter((c) => !c.currentRisk)
       },
       {
-        // Everything an alert put on the report that the policy will not move. "No change needed" read as though
-        // these customers were fine, which is not what it means: a High-rated customer with four open alerts is on
-        // this list, and the reason is that the conditions for lowering the rating are not met - not that there is
-        // nothing to look at. The reason on each row says which condition fell short.
+        // Everything an alert put on the report that the policy will not move yet. "No change needed" read as though
+        // these customers were fine, which is not what it means: a customer with four open alerts sits here, and the
+        // reason is that the period does not yet carry enough to act on - not that there is nothing to look at.
+        // "Watching" says what the section is for, and the reason on each row says which condition fell short.
         key: 'same',
-        title: 'Rating holds — no change this period',
-        hint: 'An alert brought these customers onto the report, but the conditions for moving the rating are not met. The reason on each row says what is missing.',
+        title: 'Watching — not enough to act on',
+        hint: 'In view, but the period does not yet support moving the rating. The reason on each row says what is missing.',
         tone: 'hold',
         rows: rest.filter((c) => c.currentRisk && c.direction === 'same')
       }