Files
udyamlinc-ml/models/metrics.json
T
LincPayandClaude Opus 5 4ed61a2427 feat: the UdyamLinc ML layer — scoring, explanation and quantile forecast
Brings the Python service under version control for the first time. It has
been running and serving the demo since 23 August; until now it existed only
on one developer's disk.

Contents:

  training/build_dataset.py   point-in-time join over the feature store, with
                              leakage assertions. dscr_p10 and dscr_p50 are
                              excluded deliberately — both are derived from
                              the forecast, which is derived from the
                              instalment, so the model would read its own
                              answer.
  training/train_stress.py    LightGBM vs XGBoost vs two single-feature
                              baselines, expanding-window validation over
                              as-of dates, publishes to the model_metric table
  training/train_forecast.py  three quantile heads (P10/P50/P90), horizon as a
                              feature rather than one model per horizon
  serving/explain.py          SHAP TreeExplainer folded into the five risk
                              families the console already speaks. The family
                              map mirrors RuleBasedScoringStrategy in the API
                              repo; where they disagree the rule engine wins.
  serving/app.py              /score, /score/batch, /forecast, /health, /model

The trained models, their metrics and the training dataset are committed
alongside the code. Without them the published AUC of 0.760 is a claim nobody
else can check; at ~2.2 MB together they are worth the space.

Measured, on 5,523 rows / 263 enterprises / 242 positives / 100% synthetic
labels: LightGBM AUC-ROC 0.7599, and the emi_to_inflow baseline 0.7685 on the
same folds. The baseline wins. That is recorded rather than tuned away — on
generated labels, beating it would mostly prove the model had learned the
generator.

The quantile forecast beats the deterministic strategy on all three quantiles
(pinball loss, 12-33% better) but flags every borrower as breaching, so the
deployment runs udyam.forecast.engine=DETERMINISTIC and this model is held
back pending calibration against real repayment outcomes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-25 13:43:40 +05:30

192 lines
5.7 KiB
JSON

{
"dataset": {
"rows": 5523,
"positives": 242,
"positive_rate": 0.0438,
"as_of_dates": 21,
"synthetic_label_share": 1.0
},
"validation": "expanding-window time-series split over as-of dates",
"feature_order": [
"feed_cost_change",
"output_price_change",
"margin_squeeze",
"price_z_score",
"rainfall_anomaly",
"heat_anomaly",
"cash_flow_change",
"emi_delay",
"inventory_days",
"upi_inflow_change",
"feed_staleness_days",
"days_since_last_entry",
"emi_to_inflow",
"feed_cost_change__missing",
"output_price_change__missing",
"margin_squeeze__missing",
"price_z_score__missing",
"rainfall_anomaly__missing",
"heat_anomaly__missing",
"cash_flow_change__missing",
"emi_delay__missing",
"inventory_days__missing",
"upi_inflow_change__missing",
"feed_staleness_days__missing",
"days_since_last_entry__missing",
"emi_to_inflow__missing",
"dpd_at_t",
"outstanding_at_t",
"emi_at_t",
"sector_id",
"district_id"
],
"algorithms": {
"lightgbm": {
"folds": [
{
"n": 789,
"positives": 38,
"auc_roc": 0.6814422874763473,
"pr_auc": 0.12090605567917119,
"brier": 0.0690301962610968,
"red_flagged": 23,
"precision_red": 0.17391304347826086,
"recall_red": 0.10526315789473684,
"recall_flagged": 0.3684210526315789,
"train_to": "2025-03-31",
"test_from": "2025-04-30"
},
{
"n": 789,
"positives": 31,
"auc_roc": 0.7962805345135756,
"pr_auc": 0.17203736204143655,
"brier": 0.08691410549130126,
"red_flagged": 54,
"precision_red": 0.14814814814814814,
"recall_red": 0.25806451612903225,
"recall_flagged": 0.6129032258064516,
"train_to": "2025-06-30",
"test_from": "2025-07-31"
},
{
"n": 789,
"positives": 39,
"auc_roc": 0.8423931623931624,
"pr_auc": 0.22591607572996394,
"brier": 0.11095460084002903,
"red_flagged": 90,
"precision_red": 0.2222222222222222,
"recall_red": 0.5128205128205128,
"recall_flagged": 0.8205128205128205,
"train_to": "2025-09-30",
"test_from": "2025-10-31"
},
{
"n": 1052,
"positives": 51,
"auc_roc": 0.7193982488100136,
"pr_auc": 0.20698077930278122,
"brier": 0.08188506640426521,
"red_flagged": 59,
"precision_red": 0.22033898305084745,
"recall_red": 0.2549019607843137,
"recall_flagged": 0.43137254901960786,
"train_to": "2025-12-31",
"test_from": "2026-01-31"
}
],
"pooled": {
"auc_roc": 0.7599,
"pr_auc": 0.1815,
"brier": 0.0872,
"precision_red": 0.1912,
"recall_red": 0.2828,
"recall_flagged": 0.5583
}
},
"xgboost": {
"folds": [
{
"n": 789,
"positives": 38,
"auc_roc": 0.6397084588969094,
"pr_auc": 0.10510222243195182,
"brier": 0.055753882974386215,
"red_flagged": 13,
"precision_red": 0.15384615384615385,
"recall_red": 0.05263157894736842,
"recall_flagged": 0.15789473684210525,
"train_to": "2025-03-31",
"test_from": "2025-04-30"
},
{
"n": 789,
"positives": 31,
"auc_roc": 0.7543195165546004,
"pr_auc": 0.14310881976856776,
"brier": 0.05676882714033127,
"red_flagged": 24,
"precision_red": 0.20833333333333334,
"recall_red": 0.16129032258064516,
"recall_flagged": 0.3870967741935484,
"train_to": "2025-06-30",
"test_from": "2025-07-31"
},
{
"n": 789,
"positives": 39,
"auc_roc": 0.8195897435897437,
"pr_auc": 0.17177662573810526,
"brier": 0.0742882490158081,
"red_flagged": 41,
"precision_red": 0.1951219512195122,
"recall_red": 0.20512820512820512,
"recall_flagged": 0.5641025641025641,
"train_to": "2025-09-30",
"test_from": "2025-10-31"
},
{
"n": 1052,
"positives": 51,
"auc_roc": 0.7052947052947053,
"pr_auc": 0.1285152676436765,
"brier": 0.06149039790034294,
"red_flagged": 32,
"precision_red": 0.125,
"recall_red": 0.0784313725490196,
"recall_flagged": 0.27450980392156865,
"train_to": "2025-12-31",
"test_from": "2026-01-31"
}
],
"pooled": {
"auc_roc": 0.7297,
"pr_auc": 0.1371,
"brier": 0.0621,
"precision_red": 0.1706,
"recall_red": 0.1244,
"recall_flagged": 0.3459
}
}
},
"caveats": [
"Feature rows are reconstructed by fact date, not knowledge date \u2014 the archive was ingested in one pass, so a past row uses a value a live run of that date would not yet have had.",
"Labels are generated DPD history (SEEDED_HISTORY). Metrics computed on this dataset measure the generator as much as the borrowers, and must be reported as computed on synthetic history.",
"dscr_p10 and dscr_p50 are excluded: both read the current forecast at every as-of date."
],
"baselines": {
"repayment_history_only": {
"auc_roc": 0.6181,
"pr_auc": 0.0869,
"precision_red": 0.11
},
"obligation_ratio_only": {
"auc_roc": 0.7685,
"pr_auc": 0.1828,
"precision_red": 0.1001
}
},
"winner": "lightgbm",
"base_rate": 0.0438
}